Here is a link that talks about utcnow(). It's in the question, but the rest of this thread is garbage:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1599060/how-can-i-get-an-accurate-utc-time-with-python
Here's a great review of the many possible ways to get the current time:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/415511/how-to-get-current-time-in-python
Among my favorites are:
import datetime
datetime.now()
-or-
datetime.utcnow()
or:
import gmtime,strftime
strftime("%Y%m%d_%H%M%S.%f", gmtime())
or:
import datetime
datetime.datetime.now.().strftime("%Y%m%d_%H%M%S.%f")
see:
http://pleac.sourceforge.net/pleac_python/datesandtimes.html
or apparently now can just be called on its own?
import datetime
now.strftime("%Y%m%d_%H%M%S.%f")
(not quite. See: http://effbot.org/librarybook/datetime.htm
So, here's some info about no %f:
This link for strftime doesn't show %f as a formatting option:
http://www.tutorialspoint.com/python/time_strftime.htm
This link clears things up a bit, apparently time.strftime doesn't support milli-or-miro seconds, but other functions do. Also if the system doesn't support milliseconds, that is a cause of grief:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6677332/using-f-with-strftime-in-python-to-get-microseconds
Whenever I tried %f on my system, no result would be produced at all (silent failure). I got around that by using str() which does a conversion including milliseconds but doesn't seem to accept formatting and then just substituting out the characters I didn't want:
timeformatted= str(datetime.datetime.utcnow())
timeformatted = timeformatted.replace("-","")
timeformatted = timeformatted.replace(":","")
timeformatted = timeformatted.replace(" ","_")
This forum thread's commenters repeatedly urged the use of the funtion "translate", I'm not sure why I used replace instead:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10017147/python-replace-characters-in-string